Skip to Main Content
  • Login
  • Contact us
PeerLogic Project
  • Home
  • News
  • About Peer Assessment
  • Team
    • People
    • Systems
  • Services
    • PRML
    • Data Warehouse
    • Web Services
      • Sentiment Analysis
        • Instructor Demo
        • Developer Demo
      • Metareview Service
      • Reputation Service
      • Summarization Service
        • Instructor Demo
        • Developer Demo
        • API Documentation
      • Intelligent Team and Topic Assignment
      • Reviewer Assignment Service
      • The “Rainbow Graph”
        • Instructor Demo
        • Developer Demo
  • Publications
  • Outreach
  • Home
  • News
  • About Peer Assessment
  • Team
    • People
    • Systems
  • Services
    • PRML
    • Data Warehouse
    • Web Services
      • Sentiment Analysis
        • Instructor Demo
        • Developer Demo
      • Metareview Service
      • Reputation Service
      • Summarization Service
        • Instructor Demo
        • Developer Demo
        • API Documentation
      • Intelligent Team and Topic Assignment
      • Reviewer Assignment Service
      • The “Rainbow Graph”
        • Instructor Demo
        • Developer Demo
  • Publications
  • Outreach
26 Apr 2016

Perception to anonymous review

by fferry | posted in: Uncategorized | 0

Dr. Kidd and her teaching assistant, Julia Morris conducted an informal survey in ODU to investigate what students think about anonymity in peer review. They found out that peer review was viewed to bring more benefit when it wasn’t anonymous. 

Previous Post
Next Post

Recent Posts

Three papers are to be submitted to the Frontier in Education conference
April 19, 2017

NC State research team is submitting three new research papers: 1. Improving Formation of Student...

fferryApril 19, 2017
Three papers to be presented at Frontiers in Education 2016
June 23, 2016

The team members manage to get three papers accepted at the 46th Annual Frontiers in...

fferryJune 23, 2016
CSPRED Workshop
June 23, 2016

The project members from NC State, Ed Gehringer, Ferry Pramudianto and Yang Song organize the...

fferryJune 23, 2016
TLT Friday Live
June 23, 2016

Dr. Gehringer the lead PI of the project gave a talk on TLT Friday Live...

fferryJune 23, 2016
Errors in peer grading
April 26, 2016

Dr. Luca de Alfaro and Michael Shavlovsky did a study on the factors that influence...

fferryApril 26, 2016
What educators think about peer review?
April 4, 2016

Dr. Kidd interviewed her colleagues at Old Dominion University to find out how educators feel...

fferryApril 4, 2016
Comments are closed.

Recent Posts

  • Three papers are to be submitted to the Frontier in Education conference
  • Three papers to be presented at Frontiers in Education 2016
  • CSPRED Workshop
  • TLT Friday Live
  • Errors in peer grading

Recent Comments

    April 2016
    M T W T F S S
        Jun »
     123
    45678910
    11121314151617
    18192021222324
    252627282930  

    PeerLogic Project © 2019. All rights reserved.
    For support or new feature request, please contact:
    Dr. Ferry Pramudianto | Senior Research Engineer | 919 513-0816 | fferry (at) ncsu.edu
    Computer Science Department | North Carolina State University